Exploring your
learning preferences
A starting point for a conversation about how you approach new experiences and development.
Honey and Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire
Prepared for your one-to-one coaching
Before you begin
Allow around 10–15 minutes for the 80 statements, plus a few minutes to reflect. There are no right or wrong answers.
- Think about how you usually behave, rather than how you feel you should behave.
- Choose Agree if you agree more than you disagree. Otherwise choose Disagree.
- Choose one answer for every statement. If it depends on the situation, choose the answer that is usually closest.
- Bring your completed questionnaire to our session. We can explore anything that felt unclear or difficult to answer.
Use this to reflect on your current preferences, not to assess your ability or decide which learning opportunities to avoid. We will explore examples, exceptions and approaches you might like to try.
Completing this online?
Your answers stay in this page and are not sent anywhere by this file. They are not saved automatically. Before closing or refreshing, select Print / Save as PDF and choose Save as PDF in your browser.
The PDF provided separately is for printing and completing by hand. The HTML version calculates totals once all statements have been answered.
Statements 1–20
Choose one answer per statement: agree more, or disagree more.
Statements 21–40
Choose one answer per statement: agree more, or disagree more.
Statements 41–60
Choose one answer per statement: agree more, or disagree more.
Statements 61–80
Choose one answer per statement: agree more, or disagree more.
Your learning preferences
Your scores and chart appear automatically once you have answered all 80 statements. Each Agree answer adds one point to its group; each score is out of 20.
Activist
Reflector
Theorist
Pragmatist
Your scores at a glance
Complete all 80 statements to reveal the bars.
Number of Agree answers · scale 0–20
Using your results
Longer bars mean you agreed with more statements in that group. These are raw scores, not percentages, ability ratings or a comparison with other people.
Similar scores are fine. Read all four descriptions on the next page, then discuss what fits, what surprises you and what you would like to try. No single score defines how you should learn.
From preferences to action
Read all four descriptions. You do not need to choose just one.
Activist — Exploring through experience. You may enjoy trying something new, sharing ideas and getting involved straight away. Variety and a chance to experiment may appeal to you. Enthusiasm can help you get started, but you may move on before reviewing what happened. In coaching, try a short role-play or practical challenge, followed by a pause to reflect and plan your next step.
Reflector — Taking time to review. You may prefer to listen, observe and consider several perspectives before deciding what to do. Preparation and time to think may help you contribute. Careful reflection can reveal useful insights, but waiting for more information may delay action. In coaching, use questions in advance, a short journal or thinking time, then agree a manageable next step.
Theorist — Looking for understanding. You may want to understand why an approach makes sense and how it fits into a wider picture. Clear objectives, evidence and structured explanations may appeal to you. Questioning assumptions can bring clarity, but seeking a complete explanation may hold up experimentation. In coaching, explore a useful framework, question its assumptions and test it against your own experience.
Pragmatist — Putting ideas to work. You may prefer ideas with a clear practical use and want to know how they will help with a current challenge. Examples, demonstrations and action plans may appeal to you. This focus can turn discussion into progress, but may lead you to dismiss ideas too quickly. In coaching, test one technique in a real situation and review its effect.